Search:Please enter products name or specification to search
| NO. | Products Name | Types | Items | BP quality control specification | Chp quality control specification |
| 121 | Drynaria Rhizome | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | naringin ， hyperoside | ||||
| TESTS | Loss on drying | ≤ 13.0 % | |||
| Total ash | ≤ 7.0 % | ||||
| Ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid | ≤ 2.0 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Ethanol-soluble extractive | - | |||
| Content | ≥ 0.5 % of naringin (C27H32O14; Mr 580.5) (dried drug) | ||||
| 122 | Dwarf Lilyturf Tuber | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | β-sitosterol，methylophiopogonanone A | ||||
| TESTS | Loss on drying | ≤ 15.0 % | |||
| Total ash | ≤ 2.5 % | ||||
| Ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid | ≤ 0.5 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Water-soluble extractive | - | |||
| Content | ≥ 0.12 % of total saponins, expressed as ruscogenin (dried drug) | ||||
| 123 | Dwarf Pine Oil | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | β-sitosterol，methylophiopogonanone A | ||||
| TESTS | Loss on drying | ≤ 15.0 % | |||
| Total ash | ≤ 2.5 % | ||||
| Ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid | ≤ 0.5 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Water-soluble extractive | - | |||
| Content | ≥ 0.12 % of total saponins, expressed as ruscogenin (dried drug) | ||||
| 124 | Echinacea Angustifolia Root | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | Powder | ||||
| Examine the chromatograms obtained in the assay | The chromatogram obtained with the test solution shows a principal peak due to echinacoside and a minor peak due to cynarin. Peaks due to caffeic acid, caftaric acid, chlorogenic acid and cichoric acid are minor or may be absent | ||||
| TESTS | Foreign matter | ≤ 3 % | |||
| Echinacea purpurea（thin-layer chromatography） | echinacoside, cynarin, caffeic acid | ||||
| Loss on drying | ≤ 12.0 % | ||||
| Total ash | ≤ 12.0 % | ||||
| Ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid | ≤ 3.0 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Content | ≥ 0.5 % of echinacoside(dried drug) | |||
| 125 | Echinacea Pallida Root | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | β -Sitosterol,N-Isobutyldodecatetraenamide | ||||
| TESTS | Foreign matter | ≤ 3 % | |||
| Echinacea purpurea（thin-layer chromatography） | β-sitosterol ,N-isobutyldodecatetraenamide solution | ||||
| Loss on drying | ≤ 12.0 % | ||||
| Total ash | ≤ 7.0 % | ||||
| Ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid | ≤ 2.0 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Content | ≥ 0.2 % of echinacoside (dried drug) | |||
| 126 | Echinacea Purpurea Herb | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | caffeic acid ，chlorogenic acid | ||||
| TESTS | Loss on drying | ≤ 10.0 % | |||
| Total ash | ≤ 12.0 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Content | ≥ 0.1 % for the sum of caftaric acid and cichoric acid (dried drug) | |||
| 127 | Echinacea Purpurea Root | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Examine the chromatogram obtained in the test for other Echinacea species and Parthenium integrifolium | Caffeic acid，Cynarin，Echinacoside | ||||
| Examine the chromatograms obtained in the assay | The principal peak in the chromatogram obtained with the test solution is due to cichoric acid and a smaller peak is due to caftaric acid. Peaks due to caffeic acid and chlorogenic acid are minor or may be absent | ||||
| Thin-layer chromatography | β-sitosterol，N-isobutyldodecatetraenamide | ||||
| TESTS | Foreign matter | ≤ 3 % | |||
| Loss on drying | ≤ 10.0 % | ||||
| Total ash | ≤ 9.0 % | ||||
| Ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid | ≤ 2.0 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Content | ≥ 0.5 % for the sum of caftaric acid and cichoric acid (dried drug) | |||
| 128 | Eclipta Herb | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | wedelolactone R and 1 mg of rosmarinic acid | ||||
| TESTS | Loss on drying | ≤11.0 % | |||
| Total ash | ≤13.0 % | ||||
| Ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid | ≤2.0 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Content | ≥ 0.04 % of wedelolactone (dried drug) | |||
| 129 | Eclipta Prostrata Whole Plant | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | wedelolactone ，rosmarinic acid | ||||
| TESTS | Loss on drying | ≤11.0 % | |||
| Total ash | ≤22.0 % | ||||
| Ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid | ≤11.0 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Content | It contains ≥ 0.04% of wedelolactone (C16H10O7), calculated with reference to the dried material | |||
| 130 | Elder Flower | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | caffeic acid，chlorogenic acid ，hyperoside ，rutoside trihydrate | ||||
| TESTS | Foreign matter | ≤8 % | |||
| Sambucus ebulus L（Thin-layer chromatography） | caffeic acid，chlorogenic acid ，hyperoside ，rutoside trihydrate | ||||
| Loss on drying | ≤10.0 % | ||||
| Total ash | ≤10.0 %. | ||||
| ASSAY | Content | ≥ 0.80 % of flavonoids, expressed as isoquercitroside(dried drug) | |||
| 131 | Eleutherococcus | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | esculin， catalpol | ||||
| TESTS | Foreign matter | ≤3 % | |||
| Loss on drying | ≤10.0 % | ||||
| Total ash | ≤8.0 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Content | ≥ 0.08 % for the sum of eleutheroside B and eleutheroside E | |||
| 132 | Ephedra Herb | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | ephedrine hydrochloride，2-indanamine hydrochloride | ||||
| TESTS | Foreign matter | ||||
| Loss on drying | ≤10.0 % | ||||
| Total ash | ≤9.0 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Content | ≥ 1.0 % of ephedrine (dried drug) | |||
| 133 | Eucalyptus Leaf | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | cineole | ||||
| TESTS | Foreign matter | ≤3 % of dark and brown leaves, ≤5 % of stems and ≤2 % of other foreign matter. Cordate or ovate sessile leaves of young branches, with numerous glands on both sides, visible as points in transmitted light, are not present. Carry out the determination using 30 g of the herbal drug to be examined. | |||
| Water | ≤100 mL/kg | ||||
| Total ash | ≤6.0 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Content | "Essential oil Content: — for the whole drug, ≥ 20 mL/kg (anhydrous drug); — for the cut drug, ≥ 15 mL/kg (anhydrous drug)" | |||
| 134 | Eucalyptus Oil | IDENTIFICATION | chromatographic profile | The characteristic peaks due to α-pinene, β-pinene, α-phellandrene, limonene and 1,8-cineole in the chromatogram obtained with the test solution are similar in retention time to those in the chromatogram obtained with reference solution (a). Sabinene and camphor may be present in the chromatogram obtained with the test solution | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | α-terpineol，cineole | ||||
| TESTS | Relative density | 0.906 to 0.927 | |||
| Refractive index | 1.458 to 1.470 | ||||
| Optical rotation | 0 to +10 | ||||
| Solubility in alcohol | "— eucalyptus oil containing 70-79 % of 1,8-cineole is soluble in 10 volumes of ethanol (70 % V/V) R; — eucalyptus oil containing ≥ 80 % of 1,8-cineole is soluble in 5 volumes of ethanol (70 per cent V/V) R." | ||||
| Aldehydes | ot more than 2.0 mL of 0.5 M potassium hydroxide in alcohol (60 % V/V) is required in the 2nd titration | ||||
| Chromatographic profile | "Determine the percentage Content of each of these components. The percentages are within the following ranges: — α -pinene: 0.05 % to 10.0 %; — β -pinene: 0.05 % to 1.5 %; — sabinene: ≤ 0.3 %; — α -phellandrene: 0.05 % to 1.5 %; — limonene: 0.05 % to 15.0 %; — 1,8-cineole: ≥ 70.0 %; — camphor: ≤ 0.1 %; — disregard limit: the area of the principal peak in the chromatogram obtained with reference solution (b) (0.05%）" | ||||
| ASSAY | |||||
| 135 | Eucommia Bark | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | 5,7-dihydroxy-4-methylcoumarin ,β-itosterol | ||||
| physiochemical identification | - | ||||
| TESTS | Loss on drying | ≤ 12.0 % | |||
| Total ash | ≤ 10.0 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Ethanol-soluble extractive | - | |||
| Content | ≥ 0.10 % of pinoresinol diglucoside(dried drug) | ||||
| 136 | European Goldenrod | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | Quercitrin，Chlorogenic acid，Rutoside | ||||
| TESTS | Foreign matter | ≤ 5 % of brown coloured matter and ≤ 5 % of other foreign matter | |||
| Solidago gigantea Aiton and Solidago canadensis L（Thin-layer chromatography） | The chromatogram obtained with the test solution shows no strong orange fluorescent zone similar in position to the zone of quercitrin in the chromatogram obtained with the reference solution | ||||
| Loss on drying | ≤ 12.0 % | ||||
| Total ash | ≤ 8.0 % | ||||
| Ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid | - | ||||
| ASSAY | Content | ≥ 0.5 % and ≤ 1.5 % of flavonoids, expressed as hyperoside (dried drug). | |||
| 137 | Evodia Fruit | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | evodiamine，rutecarpine | ||||
| TESTS | Foreign matter | - | |||
| Loss on drying | ≤ 12.0 % | ||||
| Total ash | ≤ 9.0 % | ||||
| Ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid | ≤ 1.0 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Ethanol-soluble extractive | - | |||
| Content | ≥ 0.15 % for the sum of evodiamine and rutecarpine, expressed as evodiamine (dried drug) | ||||
| 138 | Fenugreek | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | trigonelline hydrochloride | ||||
| TESTS | Loss on drying | ≤ 12.0 % | |||
| Total ash | ≤ 5.0 % | ||||
| Swelling index | ≥ 6 | ||||
| Ash insoluble in hydrochloric acid | - | ||||
| ASSAY | Ethanol-soluble extractive | - | |||
| Content | - | ||||
| 139 | Feverfew | IDENTIFICATION | Microscopic examination | Powder | |
| Thin-layer chromatography | parthenolide | ||||
| TESTS | Foreign matter | ≤ 10.0 % | |||
| Loss on drying | ≤ 10.0 % | ||||
| Total ash | ≤ 12.0 % | ||||
| ASSAY | Content | ≥ 0.20 % of parthenolide (dried drug) | |||
| 140 | Fig | IDENTIFICATION | Macroscopical | Fruit compound，Receptacle | |
| TESTS | |||||
| ASSAY | Water-soluble extractive | ≥ 60.0% |